Home » Final Self-Reflection

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Categories

    • No categories

    Meta

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

    Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.

    Final Self-Reflection

    CriteriaProficient (100%)Developing (85 %)Minimum Performance (70%)Unsatisfactory (0%) 
    Content & Focus   (25%)Clearly understands content, focused upon most relevant information. And uses best sources of evidenceFamiliar with content, may not be appropriately focused or does not use best sources of evidenceHas some familiarity with content, but does not focus on most important elements. Sources are tangentially relevant, but not completely on target.Unfamiliar with content required for participation.
    Logic & Flow   (25%)Able to present an argument or topic in a logical and organized fashion.Presents an argument or topic in a thorough way, but needs better logic or organizationPresents some aspects of topic well, but lacks logic or organization in other aspectsDisorganized presentation, not supporting point of view.
    Analysis   (40%)Identifies relationships and components to clearly support opinions or ideasIdentifies relationships and components, but lacks clarity in supporting opinions or ideasIdentifies some relationships and components, but lacks some important connections.Does not identify components or relationships.
    Communication/Collaboration (10%)Demonstrates good listening and reflecting skills and contributes appropriately. Able to present clearly and effectivelyListening or reflecting skills are good and contributes appropriately. Presents clearly, but could improve speaking styleListening or reflecting skills are minimal and contributes only minimally. Presents information that is correct, but needs to work on clarity and speaking styleDoes not contribute  appropriately or lacks listening and reflecting skills

    I feel like my ability to present topics has vastly improved since our first seminar sessions, but I know I can still improve in certain areas, especially with presenting patients in way that paints the full picture but doesn’t include extraneous details.

    I think for the most part my knowledge base was pretty solid for the cases we covered. There were a few things I struggled with, like the differential list for the neonate w/ jaundice. I wasn’t previously familiar with the two disorders that resulted in enzyme deficiencies.